DSDiwakar ShuklaRésumé
ProfileSelected workExperienceBlogsCapabilitiesContact

Materials science · semiconductor processing · manufacturing

Materials tell the story. Process makes it repeatable.

Illustrated portrait of Diwakar Shukla
Diwakar ShuklaPortrait study

I connect materials behavior with process conditions—using fabrication, characterization, and structured experimentation to make technical systems more reliable.

Profile

From the microstructure to the manufacturing floor.

My work sits where material response meets manufacturing reality. At Universal Instruments, I developed electrochemical methods to study oxidation in gallium-based thermal interface materials and connect surface chemistry with thermal performance and reliability.

That work builds on semiconductor fabrication training at the Cornell NanoScale Facility and earlier quality engineering experience in steel and industrial manufacturing. Across those environments, my approach is consistent: isolate the variables, measure what matters, and turn the evidence into a process decision.

Current focus
Semiconductor processing and materials reliability
Working mode
Experiment → characterize → diagnose → improve
Education
Cornell M.Eng. ’26 · PEC B.Tech. ’25

Selected work

Featured case studies

01

Surface chemistry · thermal reliability

Quantifying oxidation in liquid-metal thermal interfaces

A measurement problem at the intersection of electrochemistry, materials characterization, and electronics reliability.

Context

Gallium-based liquid metals can provide high-performance thermal contact, but oxide formation changes how the material behaves at an interface. A useful process needs a repeatable way to measure that oxide—not just observe it.

My contribution

At Universal Instruments, I developed potentiostatic methods to dissolve, re-plate, and quantify oxide, then used microscopy and diffraction to examine the material under controlled environmental conditions.

Engineering value

The work established an experimental route for relating oxide content to thermal performance and long-term reliability, giving the broader study a more measurable process variable.

Process

  1. 01

    Control

    Prepare the material condition

    Control exposure and handling so oxide formation can be compared across samples.

  2. 02

    Measure

    Convert surface oxide into a signal

    Use potentiostatic electrochemistry to dissolve and re-plate oxide in a quantifiable workflow.

  3. 03

    Correlate

    Connect chemistry to performance

    Pair SEM and XRD observations with thermal behavior to examine reliability implications.

  • Potentiostatic electrochemistry
  • SEM
  • XRD
  • Thermal performance
  • Environmental control

02

Cleanroom · semiconductor process flow

From patterned wafer to electrical measurement

Hands-on nanofabrication training across pattern transfer, thin-film deposition, metrology, and electrical characterization.

Context

Semiconductor work depends on the full process chain: each fabrication step creates requirements for the next, and small deviations become visible in metrology or device measurements.

My contribution

During my apprenticeship at the Cornell NanoScale Facility, I worked through that chain using the SUSS MA6, AJA sputtering, Angstrom e-beam evaporation, KLA-Tencor profilometry, and electrical measurement tools.

Engineering value

The apprenticeship developed practical fluency in how lithography, deposition, film geometry, and electrical response fit together as one controlled fabrication process.

Process

  1. 01

    Pattern

    Define device geometry

    Use photolithography and the SUSS MA6 to establish the patterned process layer.

  2. 02

    Deposit

    Build the thin-film stack

    Apply sputtering and e-beam evaporation with attention to material and process conditions.

  3. 03

    Verify

    Measure structure and response

    Use profilometry, Hall effect, and four-point probe measurements to evaluate the result.

  • SUSS MA6
  • AJA sputtering
  • E-beam evaporation
  • P-7 profilometry
  • Hall & four-point probe

03

Quality engineering · steel processing

Turning recurring steel defects into process action

A production-quality investigation spanning defect detection, metallurgy, and corrective action in a rolling-mill environment.

Context

Streaks, seams, and nitrogen pickup in billets and blooms can carry defects downstream. The challenge was to separate symptoms from process causes while production continued.

My contribution

At Arora Iron & Steel Rolling Mills, I combined visual and non-destructive inspection with root-cause analysis to trace defect patterns and support corrective actions in the mill process.

Engineering value

The resulting process improvements contributed to a 25% increase in mill efficiency while strengthening the connection between quality evidence and operating decisions.

Process

  1. 01

    Detect

    Map the defect signature

    Use complementary NDT methods to locate surface and internal discontinuities.

  2. 02

    Diagnose

    Trace likely process causes

    Relate seam and streak patterns and nitrogen pickup to upstream process conditions.

  3. 03

    Improve

    Translate evidence into action

    Support corrective measures that could be applied and evaluated on the mill floor.

  • MPI
  • Liquid penetrant testing
  • X-ray
  • Ultrasonic testing
  • Root-cause analysis

Additional technical work

Further experiments and design studies

01

Ferroelectric solid electrolytes

Synthesized and characterized Li₂.₉₉Ba₀.₀₀₅ClO and Li₃ClO anti-perovskite solid-electrolyte compositions.

Solid-state synthesis · XRD · impedance spectroscopy · polarization behavior

02

Injection-molded product design

Selected polymers and developed specifications, mold considerations, and failure analyses for an injection-molded product concept.

ANSYS EduPack · DFMEA · PFMEA · durability considerations

03

Computational blast mechanics

Compared SPH and CEL approaches in ABAQUS for modeling structural response under blast loading.

ABAQUS · SPH · CEL · simulation comparison

Experience & education

Technical range, built in real process environments.

Professional experience

Aug 2025 — May 2026

Universal Instruments Corporation

Co-Op

Developed potentiostatic electrochemical methods to quantify oxide in gallium-based liquid-metal thermal interface materials, supported by SEM imaging and XRD under controlled environmental conditions.

Jan 2026 — Apr 2026

Cornell NanoScale Science & Technology Facility

Apprentice

Built cleanroom process experience across photolithography, sputtering, e-beam evaporation, profilometry, Hall-effect measurement, and four-point-probe characterization.

Jan 2024 — Jun 2024

Arora Iron & Steel Rolling Mills

Quality Assurance Intern

Investigated billet and bloom streaks, seam defects, and nitrogen pickup using non-destructive testing and root-cause analysis; corrective actions contributed to a 25% improvement in mill efficiency.

Jun 2023 — Sep 2023

Mishra Boiler Pvt. Ltd.

Summer Intern

Studied welding-related defects in AISI 304 components and supported a maintenance reduction of 30%; also evaluated rivet-based edge joining using AutoCAD and ABAQUS.

Education

Aug 2025 — May 2026

Cornell University

Master of Engineering, Materials Science & Engineering

GPA 3.6 / 4.0 · Semiconductor processing, nanofabrication, and advanced materials.

Aug 2021 — May 2025

Punjab Engineering College

Bachelor of Technology, Metallurgical & Materials Engineering

GPA 3.5 / 4.0 · Physical metallurgy, characterization, manufacturing, and engineering design.

Blogs

01

Medium

The Iron–Carbon Diagram: The Story Hidden Inside Steel

A story-led exploration of the iron–carbon phase diagram and the transformations that give steel its remarkable range of structures and properties.

Read article

02

Medium

Steel Has a Personality Too: The Story Behind the TTT Diagram

A human-centered story about how time, temperature, and cooling paths transform steel into pearlite, bainite, or martensite—and shape its final personality.

Read article

Technical capabilities

Methods are most useful when they answer the right question.

A compact view of the tools I use across fabrication, characterization, and process improvement.

01

Fabrication

  • Photolithography
  • SUSS MA6
  • AJA sputtering
  • E-beam evaporation
  • Thin-film processing

02

Characterization

  • SEM / EDS
  • XRD
  • FTIR
  • Optical microscopy
  • KLA-Tencor P-7 profilometry

03

Electrical & electrochemical

  • Potentiostatic methods
  • Impedance spectroscopy
  • Hall effect
  • Four-point probe

04

Process & quality

  • Root-cause analysis
  • Failure analysis
  • NDT
  • DFMEA / PFMEA
  • Process improvement

06 · Contact

Let’s talk about the process behind the result.

I’m interested in materials, semiconductor, process, and manufacturing engineering work where careful measurement leads to better decisions.

diwakarraj149@gmail.com